Risk and Architecture Assessment
A focused assessment of cross-domain attack paths, control gaps, operating dependencies, and target-state architecture.
Capabilities
Cyber-Physical and OT
Secure the connections among enterprise IT, operational technology, facilities, access control, video, building systems, and mission-critical infrastructure.
The problem
Building systems and industrial environments now depend on enterprise networks, and physical systems decide what digital compromise can reach. Defending IT, OT, and facilities as separate domains leaves the seams between them unowned, and the seams are where the attack paths run.
Systems and environments
- IT/OT segmentation
- Industrial control systems
- Building-management systems
- Physical access control
- Surveillance platforms
- IoT and connected devices
- Remote maintenance
- Data-center control systems
Representative risks
- A compromised enterprise account pivoting into building-management networks
- Vendor remote-maintenance paths that bypass segmentation
- Camera and access-control servers reachable from ordinary workstations
- Physical presence in mechanical spaces producing durable digital persistence
What SGS examines
- Where digital systems (cloud, access networks, IoT, building systems) intersect with physical operations
- Segmentation, remote access, and monitoring across the industrial and facility estate
- The dependencies among compute, power, cooling, access, and monitoring
- Strategic design for new campuses and facilities, so security is built in rather than bolted on
Typical outcomes
- An OT and facility-security architecture that works without disrupting operations
- A cyber-physical convergence roadmap with owners, dependencies, and budget attached
- A single view of how critical systems fail together, and what to fix first
Ways to engage
Crisis or Transformation Program
Intensive support for incident readiness, post-breach stabilization, M&A integration, leadership transition, or operating-model redesign.